Table of Contents
|
|
Page No. |
|
Quality Assurance and
Quality Control |
1 |
|
Seven Basic Quality Tools |
1 |
|
Cause Analysis Tools |
2 |
|
Quality Control Method |
3 |
|
Product Quality Monitoring |
6 |
|
Classification of Critical,
Major and Minor Defects: |
|
|
Seams and Stitching |
7 |
|
Cleanness and Appearance |
8 |
|
Materials / Fabrics |
9 |
|
Pressing (Ironing) |
9 |
|
Measurements |
10 |
|
Labels / Instructions |
10 |
Quality Assurance and Quality Control
|
|
The
terms “quality assurance” and “quality control” are often used
interchangeably to refer to ways of ensuring the quality of a service or
product. The terms, however, have different meanings. ·
Assurance: The act of giving confidence, the state of being certain or the
act of making certain. ·
Quality
assurance: The planned and
systematic activities implemented in a quality system so that quality
requirements for a product or service will be fulfilled. ·
Control: An evaluation to indicate needed corrective responses; the act
of guiding a process in which variability is attributable to a constant
system of chance causes. |
|
|
|
Seven Basic Quality Tools
|
|
These
are the most fundamental quality control (QC) tools. They were first
emphasized by Kaoru Ishikawa, professor of engineering at This
list is sometimes called the “seven quality control tools,” the “seven basic
tools” or the “seven old tools.”
|
Page-1
Cause Analysis Tools
|
|
|
Fishbone Diagram Also
Called: Cause-and-Effect Diagram, Ishikawa Diagram Variations: cause enumeration diagram, process fishbone,
time-delay fishbone, CEDAC (cause-and-effect diagram with the addition of
cards), desired-result fishbone, reverse fishbone diagram Description The fishbone diagram identifies many possible causes for an
effect or problem. It can be used to structure a brainstorming session. It
immediately sorts ideas into useful categories. When to Use a
Fishbone Diagram
Fishbone Diagram Procedure Materials
needed: flipchart or whiteboard, marking pens.
Page-2
Fishbone Diagram Example This fishbone diagram was drawn by a manufacturing team to try
to understand the source of periodic iron contamination. The team used the
six generic headings to prompt ideas. Layers of branches show thorough
thinking about the causes of the problem. For example, under the heading “Machines,” the idea “materials
of construction” shows four kinds of equipment and then several specific
machine numbers. Note that some ideas appear in two different places.
“Calibration” shows up under “Methods” as a factor in the analytical
procedure, and also under “Measurement” as a cause of lab error. “Iron tools”
can be considered a “Methods” problem when taking samples or a “Manpower”
problem with maintenance personnel. |
Quality Control Method
Quality control is a very
important task of the company. It is this task of the company that makes the
buyers buy their products as it is offered with reasonable price. The
objectives of the quality control are:
i.
Discover the quality problem
ii.
Inquire
into the causes of the problem
iii.
Collect and analyze data
iv.
Standardize the operation or process
v.
Establish the standard and check them for
verification and routine
vi.
Re-check the standard for further
improvement and establish quality assurance
system
vii. Produce and deliver quality product
Different
quality control methods are adapted at different stages of production to assure
quality of products as per buyer’s standards. These methods are described.
I.
Incoming
and outgoing material inspection: All procurement must be done by trained, experienced and person who
has been given authority for this purpose. All incoming material must be
inspected both by purchase department and store department and proper
documentation must be made against lot, quality, quality in bin card and
register. The same should be done for outgoing materials with the issue of gate
pass by the store department.
ii. Foreign country test: some tests are done outside
the country. Pilling test is done by ITA of Singapore or SGA of Hong Kong.
iii. Four point fabric inspection: It is an inspection method used
for the visual checking of fabric quality. Faults are scored with penalty
points of 1, 2, 3 and 4 according to the size and significance.
Page-3
|
Size of
defect (inches) |
Assigned
Points |
|
3 inches or less |
1 |
|
Over 3 but not over 6 inches |
2 |
|
Over 6 but not over 9 inches |
3 |
|
Over 9 inches |
4 |
|
Holes up to 1” |
2 |
|
Holes over 1” |
4 |
a.
Normally
apply for both knitted and woven fabric inspection.
b.
Assign no
more than a total of 4 points to any one linear yard of fabric regardless of
the number or size of the detected individual defects.
c.
Assign 4
points to each full width defect.
d.
This
method is a means of numerical designation that may be used for assessing the
quality of fabric. The acceptance of fabric however, depends upon the standards
that have been mutually agreed by the factory and the fabric seller/supplier.
e.
As a
guideline 28 points per 100 square meters of fabric is a common standard.
iv.
In-line
inspections, tests and examinations: quality control officer or quality control department personnel will make inspections,
tests and examinations in every hour and note down number of faults or defects
in each department/ line/ section/or table of production by each worker.
Defective works must be either rejected or as permissible should be altered.
Customer or his agent may at any time be a part of the quality control team
member or make inline inspections, tests and examinations. For this purpose
within limit the production department/ factory will make necessary personnel
and material available an access to location and space for work. In each case
written report must be prepared and signed by the person who conducted
inspection, test and examination, if buyers’ agent does this he will do it ,
quality control officer of the company
and the department in charge where the
inspection, test and examination took place.
a.
Such in-line
inspections, tests and examinations will be carried out as per requirements,
instructions and documents referred to in the buyers contract or as per the
agreement of sales by both company’s quality control officer and by buyer’s
agents. Written report has to be prepared right after inspection and signed by
the quality control officer, buyer’s agent and by the department head where
such inspection, test or examination was carried out.
b.
If any
production program (dying, cutting, printing, embossing, embroidery or
stitching) is done by subcontractor or other supplier it must be ensured by the
quality control officer and/or the buyer’s agent or by both that is done as per
standard required.
Page-4
c.
All
different program operators, machine operators and supervisors must check the
output of his/her operation and will try to make minimum defects. Inspection by
quality control officer does not invalidate their responsibilities.
d.
Results
of inspections, tests and examinations must be reported in written, signed by
quality control officer and other personnel responsible and should be submitted
to the Managing Director. It must be
remembered by all concerned that using subcontractors or other suppliers does
not cancel out our responsibility to produce and deliver required quality
products.
v. Final inspection and
testing: final inspection
and testing will be done by the quality control officer, buyer’s agent and head
of packaging department. Random sampling may be used for final inspection and
testing or buyer’s agent in the presence of quality control officer and the
head of the packaging department may carry out the inspection and testing.
a)
With the
delivery of products relevant lists, bills, certificates, declarations,
maintenance instructions or other documents has to be prepared. Without these
delivery is not considered complete. Before delivery at any time final
inspection and testing may take place.
b)
If the
company gives delivery by its own lorry then field service is given so that the
goods get no damage or quality deterioration at the field level.
Page-5
Product
Quality Monitoring
Landmark carry our Product
Quality Monitoring of finished goods prior to shipment to ensure they comply
with Acceptable Quality Limits.
Delivered goods may be subject to an inspection and rejected if defect
levels exceeds AQL’s or a critical safety issue is found.
Acceptable Quality Limits (AQL’s) have been set as follows:
Zero for critical faults,
2.5 for major faults, 4.0 for minor faults
|
SIZE |
SAMPLE SIZE |
CRITICAL (AQL-Zero) |
MAJOR (AQL-2.5) |
MINOR (AQL-4.0) |
|
51 – 90 |
13 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
91 – 150 |
20 |
1 |
1 |
2 |
|
151 – 280 |
32 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
281 – 500 |
50 |
1 |
3 |
5 |
|
501 – 1200 |
80 |
1 |
5 |
7 |
|
1201 – 3200 |
125 |
1 |
7 |
10 |
|
3201 – 10000 |
200 |
1 |
10 |
14 |
|
10001 – 35000 |
315 |
1 |
14 |
21 |
|
35001 – 150000 |
500 |
1 |
21 |
21 |
|
150001 – 500000 |
800 |
1 |
21 |
21 |
|
500000 AND ABOVE |
1250 |
1 |
21 |
21 |
Delivery instruction stock is
rejected if defects are equal to or exceed levels in the above table.
Page-6
Classification
of Critical, Major and Minor Defects
SEAMS AND STITCHING
|
DEFECTS |
CRITICAL |
MAJOR |
MINOR |
|
1. Any seams open or broken |
|
√ |
|
|
2. Any seams twisted, puckered, spiraled or
containing pleats: a) Conspicuous b) Slight |
|
√ |
√ |
|
3. Any part of garment caught in seams or
unrelated part of garment |
|
√ |
|
|
4. Any raw or uncovered seams, edges, cuffs,
hems: a) Conspicuous (outside) b) Slight |
|
√ |
√ |
|
5. Any seams not back-tacked secure or covered
by another seam (Exceptions only if specified on approved sample) |
|
√ |
|
|
6. Any needle damage: a) Multiple holes or a single hole which is likely to form into a
ladder or both b) Single hole which is unlikely to form into a ladder |
|
√ |
√ |
|
7. Any contrast stitching uneven, irregular or
mismatched: a) Conspicuous (outside) b) Slight (inside) c) Any joins in top-stitching |
|
√
√ |
√ |
|
8. Any run-offs of top-stitching: a) Conspicuous b) Slight |
|
√ |
√ |
|
9. Any excessively loose tensions or stitch
counts other than specified on approved samples |
|
√ |
√ |
|
10. Any ropy hems, cuffs,
edges or openings: a) Conspicuous b) Slight |
|
√ |
√ |
|
11. Any weakness in seam
joint, underarms, shoulders, collars, cuffs, hoods, trouser crotch |
|
√ |
|
|
12. Any drop or miss stitches
for knitted garments |
|
√ |
|
|
13. Any patterns not matched
and balanced – refer to approved sample for agreed matching and balance a) Conspicuous b) Slight |
|
√ |
√ |
|
14. Any stepping of seams – depending on severity |
|
√ |
√ |
|
15. Any uneven hems |
|
√ |
√ |
|
16. Any broken or badly attached elastic |
|
√ |
√ |
|
17. Any broken stitches |
|
√ |
√ |
|
18. Any pocket not central, untidy or uneven |
|
√ |
√ |
|
19. Any uneven dirty mark |
|
√ |
√ |
|
20. Any stitches showing through hems not agreed on approved
sample |
|
√ |
√ |
|
21. Any broken needles,
needles, pins, safety pins, staples or other sharp object found anywhere on any garment (other than
for agreed packaging purposes) |
√ |
|
|
|
22. Any functional
drawstrings in hoods and non-secured cords at waist/hem |
V up to age 10 |
V above age 10 |
|
|
23. Any monofilament sewing
yarns |
√ up to age 10 |
√ above age 10 |
|
|
99. Seams – other (depending
upon severity) |
|
√ |
√ |
Page-7
Classification
of Critical, Major and Minor Defects
CLEANNESS AND APPEARANCE
|
DEFECTS |
CRITICAL |
MAJOR |
MINOR |
|
1. Any spots, stains or soiling on the surface
of the garment |
|
√ |
√
|
|
2. Any buttons, buttonholes or poppers not
accurately spaced and in correct alignment |
|
√ |
√ |
|
3. Any broken button |
√ up to 3 years |
√ above 3 years |
|
|
4. Any buttonholes not stitched tidily and
securely or not cleanly cut |
|
√ |
|
|
5. Any loose threads or overlock ends that are
not removed from garment: a)
Outside b)
Inside (elsewhere) |
|
√ |
√ |
|
6. Any sharp or tarnished edges on belts,
buckles, zips and poppers |
√ Sharp |
√ Tarnished |
|
|
7. Any loose belt loops, poppers, buttons,
belt loops or other trims (All should
be neatly and firmly fixed) |
√ up to 24 months |
√ Above 24 months |
|
|
8. Any bubbling of fusible linings, collars,
cuffs, |
|
√ |
√
|
|
9. Any stepping on hem vents or neck openings |
|
√ |
√
|
|
10. Any non-functioning of zips or poorly
attached
a) Safety related (missing or
ineffective top cobs on open ended zips, or
other defects which cause the
slider not to be secured)
b) Other defects |
√ |
√ |
|
|
11. Any incorrect or
mismatched buttons |
|
√ |
|
|
12. Any drop stitches or miss
stitches for knitted garments |
|
√ |
√
|
|
13. Any other variation in
appearance from approved sample |
|
√ |
√
|
|
14. Any missing accessories |
|
√ |
|
|
99. Cleanness and appearance
– other (depending on severity) |
|
√ |
√
|
Page-8
Classification
of Critical, Major and Minor Defects
MATERIALS/ FABRICS
|
DEFECTS |
CRITICAL |
MAJOR |
MINOR |
|
1. Any Holes |
|
√
|
|
|
2. Any cuts, tears or surface repairs made
during production, packaging or transit |
|
√ |
|
|
3. Any pulled/ looped yarns/threads a)
External/ Visible b)
Internal (significant loops only) |
√ Up to 24 months |
√ |
√ Above 24 months |
|
4. a)
Any slubs 1 cm or more in length, or 2 threads wide in any
conspicuous or focal points of garments b)
Other hidden or obscure areas c)
Any slubs 1 cm or below
|
|
√
|
√ √ |
|
5. Any dye spots, misprint, faulty prints that
are noticeable and seriously detract from the appearance of the
fabric. |
|
√ |
√ |
|
6. Any mismatching of stripes, checks on
front, back or seams (not agreed on approved sample) |
|
√ |
√ |
|
7. Any shading of parts within the product shade variations within or between
products (not agreed on approved sample) |
|
√ |
√ |
|
8. Any unspecified piling or surface fussing
of fabrics |
|
√ |
√
|
|
9. Any high immature cotton or foreign/
contaminated fibres |
|
√ |
√
|
|
10. Any variation in handle
or finish (not agreed on approved sample) |
|
√ |
√
|
|
99. Materials/ Fabrics –
Other (depending on severity) |
|
√ |
√
|
Classification
of Critical, Major and Minor Defects
PRESSING (Ironing)
|
DEFECTS |
CRITICAL |
MAJOR |
MINOR |
|
1. Any burn or scorch marks |
|
√
|
√
|
|
2. Any glazing or pressure marks on the
surface: a)
Conspicuous b)
Slight |
|
√
|
√ |
|
3. Press marks from clips, coat hangers,
others: a)
Conspicuous b)
Slight |
|
√
|
√ |
|
4. Any un-pressed or poorly pressed seams |
|
√
|
√
|
|
5. Any absence of pressing when specified: a)
Conspicuous b)
Slight |
|
√
|
√
|
|
6. Any dry creases |
|
√
|
√
|
|
7. Any crease due to transit |
|
√
|
√
|
|
99. Pressing – other
(depending on severity) |
|
√
|
√
|
Page-9
Classification
of Critical, Major and Minor Defects
MEASUREMENTS
|
DEFECTS |
CRITICAL |
MAJOR |
MINOR |
|
1. Any
measurement not to size specification and tolerances specified |
|
√
|
|
|
2.
Any variation in length
or width of legs, sleeves, collars, etc within the garment |
|
√
|
|
|
3.
Any neck stretch not
achieving a minimum ** |
√
|
|
|
|
99. Measurements – other (depending on
severity) |
|
√
|
√
|
** Minimum Neck Stretch Requirement:
Up to and including 50 cm 52
cm total (26 cm half)
55 to 66 cm inclusive 54
cm total (27 cm half)
69 cm upward 56
cm total (28 cm half)
The above requirements vary
from buyer to buyer.
Classification
of Critical, Major and Minor Defects
LABELS/ INSTRUCTIONS
|
DEFECTS |
CRITICAL |
MAJOR |
MINOR |
|
1. Incorrect label position |
|
√
|
|
|
2.
Any incorrect or
missing information on label other than barcode, fiber content, materials: a)
Size b)
Color c)
d)
Others |
|
√ √ √ √
|
|
|
3.
Any back neck labels
not placed central and neatly to back |
|
√
|
√
|
|
4.
Any damage from
incorrectly attached labels |
|
√
|
|
|
5.
Any variation in and
presentation of sewing tickets |
|
|
√
|
|
6.
Any Staining and/or
distortion from adhesive labels |
|
√
|
|
|
7.
Any incorrect sizing of
hangers |
|
√
|
|
|
8.
Any illegible labels or
marking |
|
√
|
|
|
9.
Any unattached or badly
stitched labels |
|
√
|
|
|
10. Any fraying labels |
|
√
|
√
|

0 coment rios: